Paris v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Marcus Paris
Defendant: Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC and Rausch Sturm LLP
Case Number: 2:2022cv01754
Filed: October 19, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Presiding Judge: Andrew P Gordon
Referring Judge: Brenda Weksler
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 15, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Plaintiff Marcus Paris. as to Rausch Sturm. (Krieger, David)
November 7, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE of Settlement between Plaintiff and Defendant Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC and Defendant Rausch Sturm LLP by Marcus Paris.. (Miller, Shawn)
October 27, 2022 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Marcus Paris re #4 Summons Issued, #1 Complaint,. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC served on 10/21/2022. (Krieger, David)
October 27, 2022 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Marcus Paris re #4 Summons Issued, #1 Complaint,. Rausch Sturm LLP served on 10/21/2022. (Krieger, David)
October 20, 2022 Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to All Defendants re #1 Complaint. (HAM)
October 20, 2022 Filing 3 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Andrew P. Gordon. Judge Gordon's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM)
October 20, 2022 Case randomly assigned to Judge Andrew P. Gordon and Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler. (HAM)
October 19, 2022 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Marcus Paris. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case. (Krieger, David)
October 19, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $402 receipt number ANVDC-7086997) by Marcus Paris. Proof of service due by 1/17/2023. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons PRA, #3 Summons Rausch) (Krieger, David) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Paris v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marcus Paris
Represented By: David H. Krieger
Represented By: Shawn Wayne Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rausch Sturm LLP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?