Davenport v. Rocket Mortgage, LLC
Daniel Davenport |
Rocket Mortgage, LLC |
2:2022cv01785 |
October 25, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Nancy J Koppe |
James C Mahan |
Consumer Credit |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Rocket Mortgage, LLC that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. Corporate Parent RKT Holdings, LLC, Corporate Parent Rock Holdings Inc., Corporate Parent Rocket Companies, Inc. for Rocket Mortgage, LLC added.. (Allison, Jeffrey) |
Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, filed by Rocket Mortgage, LLC. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 2/4/2023.(Allison, Jeffrey) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Filing 7 ORDER Granting #6 Motion to Extend Time to Answer #1 Complaint. Rocket Mortgage, LLC answer due 12/21/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 11/22/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KF) |
Filing 6 Joint MOTION to Extend Time (First Request) to File Response to the Complaint re #1 Complaint, by Defendant Rocket Mortgage, LLC. Responses due by 12/5/2022. (Allison, Jeffrey) (answer) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Daniel Davenport re #4 Summons Issued. Rocket Mortgage, LLC served on 10/31/2022. (Haines, George) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Rocket Mortgage, LLC re #1 Complaint. (KF) |
Case randomly assigned to Judge James C. Mahan and Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe. (KF) |
Filing 3 ERRATA to #1 Complaint, by Plaintiff Daniel Davenport. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Summons) (Avalos, Gerardo) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Daniel Davenport. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Avalos, Gerardo) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $402 receipt number ANVDC-7093993) by Daniel Davenport. Proof of service due by 1/23/2023. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (Avalos, Gerardo) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Davenport v. Rocket Mortgage, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Daniel Davenport | |
Represented By: | George Haines |
Represented By: | Gerardo Avalos |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Rocket Mortgage, LLC | |
Represented By: | Jeffrey S Allison |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.