Castaneda v. Fattig et al
| Antonio Castaneda |
| J. Timothy Fattig, Ashley Sisolak and Joe Hardy |
| 2:2022cv01868 |
| November 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Andrew P Gordon |
| Nancy J Koppe |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER. It is ordered that the #4 motion is GRANTED and the deadline to file a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis is EXTENDED to January 22, 2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 12/2/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION to Extend Time (First Request) re ECF No. #3 Order, by Plaintiff Antonio Castaneda. Responses due by 12/15/2022. (CJS) (amend) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER denying #1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; IFP/Payment of filing fees due 12/7/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 11/7/2022. (Attachments: #1 IFP Inmate Form/Instructions - Copy attached for distribution to P via HDSP law library) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM)
|
| Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (CJS) |
| Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Antonio Castaneda. (Attachments: #1 Complaint)(CJS) |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Andrew P. Gordon and Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe. (CJS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
