Michael's Gourmet Pantry, Inc. v. Martin
| Michael's Gourmet Pantry, Inc. doing business as MGP Specialty Food |
| Back of the House LLC |
| 2:2022cv01953 |
| November 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Anne R Traum |
| Brenda Weksler |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 RESPONSE to #6 Motion to Dismiss by Plaintiff Michael's Gourmet Pantry, Inc.. Replies due by 1/13/2023. (Semenza, Lawrence) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss by Defendant Back of the House LLC. Responses due by 1/6/2023. (Martin, Leah) |
| Filing 5 STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendant Back of the House LLC.. (Attachments: #1 FRCP 7.1 Disclosure)(Martin, Leah) |
| Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE. Attorney Action Required to ECF No. #3 . Document was not filed pursuant to LR IC 2-2(c); The wrong event, SUPPLEMENT was selected. The title of the docket entry does not match the title of the document. Counsel is advised to refile ECF No. #3 using the appropriate event, Statement in Removal Case. The document at #3 shall be errored out by the Clerk's office. (no image attached) (DRS) |
| Filing 3 Counsel directed to refile at 4 . SUPPLEMENT to #1 Petition for Removal, by Defendant Back of the House LLC (Attachments: #1 Supplement FRCP 7.1 Disclosure) (Martin, Leah) Modified on 11/22/2022 (DRS). |
| Filing 2 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable District Judge Anne R. Traum on 11/21/2022. Statement regarding removed action is due by 12/6/2022. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 12/21/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from District Court, Clark County, Nevada, Case Number A-22-860227-C, (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANVDC-7123324) by Leah A. Martin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (Martin, Leah) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Case randomly assigned to District Judge Anne R. Traum and Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler. (HAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Michael's Gourmet Pantry, Inc. v. Martin | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Michael's Gourmet Pantry, Inc. doing business as MGP Specialty Food | |
| Represented By: | Lawrence J Semenza, II |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Back of the House LLC | |
| Represented By: | Erik Simpson |
| Represented By: | Kevin J. Hejmanowski |
| Represented By: | Leah A. Martin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
