Gunn v. Attorney General State of Nevada
Petitioner: Christopher Gunn
Respondent: Attorney General State of Nevada
Case Number: 2:2022cv01955
Filed: November 22, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Presiding Judge: Jennifer A Dorsey
Referring Judge: Brenda Weksler
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 17, 2023 Filing 6 JUDGMENT is entered in favor of Respondent Attorney General State of Nevada, and against Petitioner Christopher Gunn, without Prejudice. The certificate of appealability is denied. Signed by Clerk of Court Debra K. Kempi on 1/17/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KF)
January 17, 2023 Filing 5 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Christopher Gunn. (Filed and Dismissed without Prejudice per #4 Order - KF)
January 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER.IT IS ORDERED that 1-1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Petitioner is denied a certificate of appealability. The Clerk of Court is instructed to file the 1-1 Petition, add Nevada Attorney General Aaron D. Ford for Respondents, informally serve the Nevada Attorney General with the petition (ECF No. 1-1) and this order by sending a notice of electronic filing to the Nevada Attorney Generals office, and enter final judgment and close case. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 1/17/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KF)
November 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER.IT IS ORDERED that the Petitioner must pay the $5.00 filing fee or file a complete IFP Application with the Court by 1/13/2023. If Petitioner fails to do so, this case will be dismissed without prejudice and without further prior notice. The Clerk of Court is instructed to SEND petitioner a blank form IFP application for incarcerated litigants along with two copies of this order. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 11/30/2022. (Attachments: #1 Second Copy of Order, #2 IFP Application and Instructions - all to be provided to P through the law library)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KF)
November 22, 2022 Case randomly assigned to Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey and Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler. (HAM)
November 21, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE from USDC advising case against Attorney General State of Nevada, et al., has been received and assigned case number 2:22-cv-01955-JAD-BNW. (KF)
November 21, 2022 Filing 1 RECEIPT of Initiating Documents by Court on behalf of Petitioner. No Application to Proceed IFP or Filing Fee received. (Attachments: #1 Petition) (KF)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gunn v. Attorney General State of Nevada
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Christopher Gunn
Represented By: HDSP Law Library
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Attorney General State of Nevada
Represented By: Aaron D. Ford-AG
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?