Stine v. Peebles
De'jeane Stine |
James Peebles and Samantha Peebles |
2:2022cv01963 |
November 22, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Richard F Boulware |
Nancy J Koppe |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 NOTICE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE IB 2-2: In accordance with 28 USC 636(c) and FRCP 73, the parties in this action are provided with a link to the "AO 85 Notice of Availability, Consent, and Order of Reference - Exercise of Jurisdiction by a U.S. Magistrate Judge" form on the Court's website - #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. AO 85 Consent forms should NOT be electronically filed. Upon consent of all parties, counsel are advised to manually file the form with the Clerk's Office. (A copy of form AO 85 has been mailed to parties not receiving electronic service.) (HAM) |
Filing 11 ORDER granting #10 Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order; Discovery due by 5/22/2023. Motions due by 6/21/2023. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 7/21/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 1/18/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM) |
Filing 10 Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order by Defendant James Peebles.. (Green, Andrew) |
Filing 9 ANSWER re #1 Petition for Removal,, filed by James Peebles.(Green, Andrew) |
Filing 8 ORDER. The parties are hereby ordered to file no later than January 17, 2023, a joint proposed discovery plan. Defendants are further ordered to file a copy of their answer filed in state court on this case's docket no later than January 10, 2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 1/3/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LOE) |
Filing 7 Joint STATUS REPORT by Defendant James Peebles.. (Green, Andrew) |
Filing 6 STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendant James Peebles.. (Green, Andrew) |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by De'jeane Stine. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case. (McTarian, Alexander) |
Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 11/23/2022. Statement regarding removed action is due by 12/8/2022. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 12/23/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM) |
Filing 3 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Judge Richard F. Boulware, II. Judge Boulware's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM) |
Case randomly assigned to Judge Richard F. Boulware, II and Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe. (HAM) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by James Peebles. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case. (Green, Andrew) |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from District Court, Clark County, Nevada, Case Number A-22-859563-C, (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANVDC-7125407) by James Peebles. Proof of service due by 1/5/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3) (Green, Andrew) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.