Dzik v. Johnson et al
| Mitchell Dzik |
| Johnson, Steve Sisolak, Barrett, Assistant Warden HDSP and Padilla |
| 2:2022cv01982 |
| November 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Gloria M Navarro |
| Elayna J Youchah |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER Granting in part and Denying in part #7 Motion to Extend Time. IT IS FORDERED that on or before 2/282023, Plaintiff must either pay the $402 filing fee or file with the Court the required components. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court will not grant any further extensions of time absent unusual circumstances. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court must send Plaintiff the approved form application to proceed IFP for inmates along with the information and instructions for filing the same. Documents attached for distribution to Plaintiff. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah on 1/11/2023. Documents attached for distribution to Plaintiff. (Attachments: #1 Inmate IFP Application and Instructions)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TRW)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION to Extend Time (First Request) to Comply with #3 Magistrate's Order by Plaintiff Mitchell Dzik. Responses due by 1/4/2023. (Image Identical to ECF No. 4 Motion.)(DRS) (discovery) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Hearing, by Plaintiff Mitchell Dzik. (Image Identical to ECF Nos. #4 , #5 Motions.)(DRM) (referral) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Injunctive Relief, by Plaintiff Mitchell Dzik. (Image Identical to ECF No. #4 Motion.)(DRM) |
| Filing 4 Emergency MOTION to be immediately heard, by Plaintiff Mitchell Dzik. Responses due by 1/4/2023. (DRM) (misc) (referral) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER that Plaintiffs Motion to Compel (ECF No. #1 -3) is DENIED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that on or before 1/3/2023, Plaintiff must either pay the $402 filing fee for a civil action or file with the Court: (1) a complete Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis for Inmate on the Courts approved form; (2) a Financial Certificate properly signed by both the inmate and a prison or jail official; and (3) a copy of the inmates prison or jail trust fund account statement for the previous six-month period. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court must send Plaintiff the approved form application to proceed in forma pauperis for inmates along with the information and instructions for filing the same. Documents attached for distribution to Plaintiff. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that failure to either pay the $402 filing fee or file a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis on or before 1/3/2023, will result in a recommendation to dismiss this action without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court will retain Plaintiffs Complaint (ECF No. #1 -1), but will not file it at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah on 12/2/2022. Documents attached for distribution to Plaintiff. (Attachments: #1 Inmate IFP Application and Instructions)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TRW)
|
| Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (DRM) |
| Filing 1 RECEIPT of Initiating Documents by Court on behalf of Plaintiff. No Application to Proceed IFP or Filing Fee received. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Motion for Injunctive Relief, #3 Motion to Compel) (DRM) |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Gloria M. Navarro and Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah. (DRM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
