Kidd v. University Medical Center of Southern Nevada et al.
Julia Kidd |
University Medical Center of Southern Nevada, University Medical Center of Southern Nevada and the Clark County Board of Commissioners and Administrator of University Medical Center of Southern Nevada |
2:2022cv01990 |
November 29, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Nancy J Koppe |
Anne R Traum |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 451 Employment Discrimination |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER Scheduling Early Neutral Evaluation session. Early Neutral Evaluation set for Thursday, 3/23/2023 at 10:00 AM in LV Courtroom 3A before Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts. Written evaluation statements must be submitted by email to Kimberly_LaPointe@nvd.uscourts.gov by 4:00 p.m. on Thursday, 3/16/2023. Do not deliver or mail them to the clerks office. Do not serve a copy on opposing counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 1/24/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Administrator of University Medical Center of Southern Nevada, University Medical Center of Southern Nevada. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case. (Gonzales, William) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss #6 Amended Complaint by Defendants Administrator of University Medical Center of Southern Nevada, University Medical Center of Southern Nevada. Responses due by 2/2/2023. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 3/5/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M, #14 Exhibit N, #15 Exhibit O, #16 Exhibit P, #17 Exhibit Q, #18 Exhibit R)(Dushoff, Matthew) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants by Julia Kidd. Removes parties. (Hatfield, Trevor) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Julia Kidd. University Medical Center of Southern Nevada and the Clark County Board of Commissioners served on 12/1/2022. (Hatfield, Trevor) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Julia Kidd. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Hatfield, Trevor) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to University Medical Center of Southern Nevada re #1 Complaint. (KF) |
Filing 2 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 16-6 this case has been assigned to the Early Neutral Evaluation Program. Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts will be the evaluating judge in this case. (no image attached) (KF) |
Case randomly assigned to District Judge Anne R. Traum and Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe. (KF) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $402 receipt number ANVDC-7130627) by Julia Kidd. Proof of service due by 2/27/2023. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Hatfield, Trevor) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.