Northfield Insurance Company v. Cheyenne Condominium Association et al
| Northfield Insurance Company |
| Cheyenne Condominium Association, Diamond Perry and Davion Warnock |
| 2:2022cv02072 |
| December 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Cam Ferenbach |
| James C Mahan |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Cheyenne Condominium Association, Diamond Perry, and Davion Warnock re #1 Complaint. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons) (TRW) |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge James C. Mahan and Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach. (TRW) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Cheyenne Condominium Association, Diamond Perry, Davion Warnock (Filing fee $402 receipt number ANVDC-7146371) by Northfield Insurance Company. Proof of service due by 3/14/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons as to Cheyenne Condominium Association, #4 Summons as to Diamond Perry, #5 Summons as to Davion Warnock) (Reeves, William) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
