Goodhope v. DeRoyal Industries, Inc.
| Linda Goodhope |
| DeRoyal Industries, Inc. |
| 2:2022cv02098 |
| December 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Daniel J Albregts |
| Andrew P Gordon |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order by Defendant DeRoyal Industries, Inc... (Thome, Sheri) |
| Filing 14 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 2/15/2023. Re: #13 Discovery plan. Having reviewed the parties' discovery plan, the Court finds that it fails to comply with Local Rule 26-1(b)(7), (8), (9), and (10). Additionally, it cites to an outdated version of Local Rule 26-1, cites to the wrong Local Rule regarding extensions, and includes an interim status report deadline, which is no longer required by the Local Rules. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the discovery plan #13 is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties meet and confer and re-file a compliant discovery plan on or before March 1, 2023. (no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KL) |
| Filing 13 Proposed Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order by Plaintiff Linda Goodhope.. (Leavitt, Johnathan) |
Filing 12
ORDER granting #10 Stipulation to dismiss the punitive damages claim in the #1 -1 First Amended Complaint without prejudice. ORDER withdrawing #8 Motion to dismiss. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 1/19/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM) Modified on 1/19/2023 (HAM).
|
| Case Reopened. (HAM) |
| Filing 11 Joint STATUS REPORT by Defendant DeRoyal Industries, Inc... (Thome, Sheri) |
| Filing 10 STIPULATION TO DISMISS Stipulation and Order to Dismiss Prayer for Punitive Damages in First Amended Complaint without Prejudice by Defendant DeRoyal Industries, Inc.. (Thome, Sheri) (dismiss) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER with Jury Demand re #1 Petition for Removal,, filed by DeRoyal Industries, Inc.. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 2/23/2023.(Thome, Sheri) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss Prayer for Punitive Damages in First Amended Complaint re #1 Petition for Removal,, by Defendant DeRoyal Industries, Inc.. Responses due by 1/23/2023. (Thome, Sheri) (misc) (dispositive) |
| Filing 7 STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendant DeRoyal Industries, Inc... (Thome, Sheri) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Linda Goodhope. DeRoyal Industries, Inc. served on 12/16/2022. (Leavitt, Johnathan) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Linda Goodhope. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case. (Leavitt, Johnathan) |
| Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 12/19/2022. Statement regarding removed action is due by 1/3/2023. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 1/18/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM) |
| Filing 3 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Andrew P. Gordon. Judge Gordon's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by DeRoyal Industries, Inc.. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Thome, Sheri) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Eighth Judicial District Court, Case Number A-22-861297-C, (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANVDC-7150272) by DeRoyal Industries, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (Thome, Sheri) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Andrew P. Gordon and Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts. (HAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Goodhope v. DeRoyal Industries, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Linda Goodhope | |
| Represented By: | Johnathan Myron Leavitt |
| Represented By: | Richard A Harris |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: DeRoyal Industries, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Sheri M. Thome |
| Represented By: | Jason R. Wigg |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
