Brown-Adams v. Raiders Football Club, LLC
| Nicole Brown-Adams |
| Raiders Football Club, LLC |
| 2:2022cv02149 |
| December 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Richard F Boulware |
| Cam Ferenbach |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2003 Job Discrimination |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Nicole Brown-Adams re #1 Complaint,. Raiders Football Club, LLC served on 2/21/2023. (Watkins, Daniel) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Raiders Football Club, LLC. (LOE) |
| Filing 7 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued by Plaintiff Nicole Brown-Adams. (Watkins, Daniel) |
| Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE. Attorney Action Required to Proposed Summons attached to ECF No. #1 . ERROR: Proposed Summons is blank. Counsel is advised to refile a properly completed proposed summons, including defendant's name, using the Proposed Summons to be Issued event. (no image attached) (EDS) |
| Filing 5 First AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Raiders Football Club, LLC by Nicole Brown-Adams. No changes to parties. (Watkins, Daniel) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Nicole Brown-Adams. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Watkins, Daniel) |
| Filing 3 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 16-6 this case has been assigned to the Early Neutral Evaluation Program. Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe will be the evaluating judge in this case. (no image attached) (LOE) |
| Filing 2 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Judge Richard F. Boulware, II. Judge Boulware's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LOE) |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Richard F. Boulware, II and Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach. (LOE) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Raiders Football Club, LLC (Filing fee $402 receipt number ANVDC-7156567) by Nicole Brown-Adams. Proof of service due by 3/27/2023. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (Watkins, Daniel) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Brown-Adams v. Raiders Football Club, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Nicole Brown-Adams | |
| Represented By: | Daniel R Watkins |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Raiders Football Club, LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
