Dzik v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
| Mitchell Dzik |
| Nevada Department of Corrections, State of Nevada, Steve Sisolak, Calvin Johnson, Barrett, Padilla, Lopez, Hill, Moca, West, Florez, Warden of High Desert State Prison and Assistant Warden HDSP |
| 2:2022cv02166 |
| December 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Jennifer A Dorsey |
| Cam Ferenbach |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER Denying #1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. IT IF FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff has until 3/20/2023, to either pay the full $402 filing fee or file a new fully complete application to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 1/19/2023. (Attachments: #1 IFP/Instructions)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)
|
| Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (CJS) |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey and Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach. (CJS) |
| Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Mitchell Dzik. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Motion for Appointment of Counsel, #3 Motion for Emergency Injunctive Relief - Hearing Requested, #4 Cover Letter)(CJS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
