Calabrese v. Social Security
| Timothy Calabrese |
| SSA-Office of the General Counsel |
| Commissioner Of Social Security |
| 2:2023cv00386 |
| March 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Cam Ferenbach |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NOTICE to Clerk of Court Regarding Assignment of Social Security Cases. (Document restricted under General Order 2019-08.) (Dunn, Jennifer) |
| Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE pursuant to General Order 2019-08: This case has been randomly assigned to a Magistrate Judge pending the parties' consent or declination. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), with written consent of all parties, a Magistrate Judge may conduct all proceedings in a case, including all pretrial and trial proceedings, entry of judgment, and post-trial motions. Any appeals will be made directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The form to indicate whether you consent or decline is attached. Consent or declination is due by 5/17/2023. Please file the completed form under the filing event Notice to Clerk - Consent or Declination in the Social Security Case civil menu category. (AF) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney L. Jamala Edwards on behalf of Defendant Commissioner Of Social Security. (Edwards, L.) |
Filing 8
ORDER Granting #7 Verified Petition for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Jennifer L. Dunn for Timothy Calabrese and approving Designation of Local Counsel Hal Taylor. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 3/17/2023. Any Attorney not yet registered with the Court's e-filng system shall register on the PACER website #www.pacer.gov(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)
|
| Filing 7 First MOTION/VERIFIED PETITION for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice by Jennifer L. Dunn and DESIGNATION of Local Counsel Hal Taylor (Filing fee $ 250 receipt number ANVDC-7238366) by Plaintiff Timothy Calabrese. (Taylor, Hal) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Timothy Calabrese. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Taylor, Hal) |
| Filing 5 COMPLAINT against SSA-Office of the General Counsel, Commissioner Of Social Security by Timothy Calabrese. Certificate of Interested Parties due by 3/26/2023. Proof of service due by 6/14/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (JQC) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER Granting #1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that #1 -1, #1 -2 Plaintiff's Complaint will proceed against Defendant. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 3/16/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE to Clerk of Court Regarding Assignment of Social Security Cases. (Document restricted under General Order 2019-08.) (JQC) (Main Document 3 replaced on 3/15/2023) (JQC). |
| Case randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach. (JQC) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Timothy Calabrese. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Taylor, Hal) |
| Filing 1 First MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Timothy Calabrese. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A to Complaint, #3 Civil Cover Sheet CCS)(Taylor, Hal) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
