King v. Johnson et al
| Shaizon I. King |
| Calvin Johnson, Jeremy Bean, James Scally, Dean Ontiveros, Jay Barth, Lamicia Bailey, Mrs. Abel and Caseworker Lopez |
| 2:2023cv00508 |
| April 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Jennifer A Dorsey |
| Cam Ferenbach |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER Denying without Prejudice #1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis.IT IS ORDERED that by 6/12/2023, Plaintiff must pay the $402 filing fee or file a complete IFP Application with the Court. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send Plaintiff Shaizon I. King the approved form application to proceed in forma pauperis for an inmate and instructions for the same, and to retain the complaint (ECF No. 1-1) but not file it at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 4/11/2023. (Attachments: #1 IFP Application and Instructions)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KF)
|
| Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (CJS) |
| Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Shaizon I. King. (Attachments: #1 Complaint)(CJS) |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey and Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach. (CJS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
