Norton, III v. Hutchingson et al
Joseph Martin Norton, III |
William Hutchingson, James Scally and Luiz |
2:2023cv00611 |
April 20, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Richard F Boulware |
Cam Ferenbach |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re ECF No. #4 Notice of Change of Address addressed to Joseph Martin Norton, III at HDSP Law Library. (DLS) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Change of Address by Plaintiff Joseph Martin Norton, III. Address updated to: High Desert State Prison, PO Box 650, Indian Springs, NV 89070-0650. (JQC) |
Filing 3 ORDER Denying without prejudice #1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Payment of filing fees or file a new fully complete application to proceed in forma pauperis due 6/23/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 4/24/2023. (Attachments: #1 IFP/Instructions)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC) |
Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (CJS) |
Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Joseph Martin Norton, III. (Hearing Requested with Jury Demands) (Attachments: #1 Complaint)(CJS) |
Case randomly assigned to Judge Richard F. Boulware, II and Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach. (CJS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.