Wallace v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al
| Floyd Wallace |
| Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, State of Nevada, Christian Torres, Jason Shoemaker and Cory McCormick |
| 2:2023cv00809 |
| May 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Andrew P Gordon |
| Nancy J Koppe |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 7/18/2023. Regarding the Requirements of Klingele v. Eikenberry and Rand v. Rowland as to #8 Motion to Dismiss,,. Opposition due 14 days from the date of this Minute Order, and reply due seven 7 days after the filing of the opposition. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ALZ) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Strike #6 Complaint by Defendant Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department. Responses due by 7/31/2023. (Anderson, Craig) (pleading) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Preclude Jose DeCastro from Practicing Law Without a License by Defendant Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department. Responses due by 7/31/2023. (Anderson, Craig) (misc) (nondispositive) |
| Filing 9 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case. (Anderson, Craig) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss #6 Complaint by Defendant Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department. Responses due by 7/31/2023. Certificate of Interested Parties due by 7/27/2023. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 8/31/2023. (Anderson, Craig) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS ISSUED as to All Defendants. (Emailed to floydwallacecivilrights@gmail.com on 6/20/2023.) (DRM) |
| Filing 6 COMPLAINT against Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Cory McCormick, Jason Shoemaker, State of Nevada, Christian Torres by Floyd Wallace. (JQC) |
Filing 5
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff must effectuate service within 90 days of this order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 6/1/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)
|
| Filing 4 RECEIPT of Payment: $ 402, receipt number 4189 (HAM) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff must either make the necessary arrangements to pay the filing fee, accompanied by a copy of this order, or file a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk of the Court shall send Plaintiff the short form application to proceed informa pauperis by a non-prisoner. Plaintiff must comply with this order no later than June 22, 2023. Failure to comply will result in a recommendation to the District Judge that this case be dismissed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 5/25/2023. (Attachments: #1 IFP)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ALZ)
|
| Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (JQC) |
| Filing 1 RECEIPT of Initiating Documents by Court on behalf of Plaintiff. No Application to Proceed IFP or Filing Fee received. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons, #4 Certificate of Interested Parties) (JQC) |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Andrew P. Gordon and Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe. (KF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
