Knisely v. Office of the Assistant Attorney General Criminal Division
| Susan Knisely |
| Office of the Assistant Attorney General Criminal Division |
| 2:2023cv00821 |
| May 25, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Jennifer A Dorsey |
| Nancy J Koppe |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER. IT IS RECOMMENDED that his case be dismissed without prejudice. Further, because the undersigned is recommending that this case be dismissed. Plaintiff's #9 Motion to Compel is DENIED without prejudice. Objections to R&R due by 7/25/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 7/11/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ALZ)
|
| Filing 10 REDACTED Exhibit, filed by Plaintiff Susan Knisely. (JQC) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Compel by Plaintiff Susan Knisely. Responses due by 7/18/2023. (ALZ) |
| Filing 8 EXHIBIT to #7 Response to Order to Show Cause by Plaintiff Susan Knisely. (JQC) |
| Filing 7 RESPONSE to #5 Order to Show Cause by Plaintiff Susan Knisely. (JQC) |
| Filing 6 Consent for Electronic Service of Documents by Plaintiff Susan Knisely. (JQC) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Plaintiff is hereby Ordered to show cause in writing, no later than 6/30/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 5/26/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)
|
| Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE that this case is randomly reassigned to Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey for all further proceedings. All further documents must bear the correct case number 2:23-cv-00821-JAD-NJK. (no image attached) (AMMi) |
| Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge James C. Mahan on 5/25/2023. By Deputy Clerk: Aaron Blazevich-Gonzalez. With good cause appearing, the Honorable Judge James C. Mahan recuses himself in this action. IT IS ORDERED that this action is referred to the Clerk for random reassignment of this case for all further proceedings. (no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ABG) |
| Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (AMMi) |
| Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Susan Knisely. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Complaint, #3 Summons, #4 Consent to Proceed Before MJ)(AMMi) |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge James C. Mahan and Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe. (AMMi) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Knisely v. Office of the Assistant Attorney General Criminal Division | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Susan Knisely | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Office of the Assistant Attorney General Criminal Division | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
