Patel et al v. Stewartson
| Kashyap Patel, The Kash Foundation and The Kash Foundation, Inc. |
| Jim Stewartson |
| 2:2023cv00873 |
| June 3, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Andrew P Gordon |
| Nancy J Koppe |
| Assault Libel & Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 SUMMONS Returned Unexecuted by Kashyap Patel as to All Defendants. (Chattah, Sigal) |
| Filing 13 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by The Kash Foundation, Inc.. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case. (Chattah, Sigal) |
Filing 12
ORDER - I THEREFORE ORDER that the plaintiffs' certificate of interested parties (ECF No. #11 ) is STRICKEN for failure to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1(a)(2). I FURTHER ORDER the plaintiffs to file a proper certificate of interested parties by June 23, 2023 (6/23/2023). Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 6/14/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CJS)
|
| Filing 11 STRICKEN pursuant to #12 Order CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Kashyap Patel, The Kash Foundation, Inc.. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case. (Chattah, Sigal) Modified on 6/14/2023 (CJS). |
|
Filing 10
ORDER - I ORDER that the plaintiffs' certificate of interested parties (ECF No. #4 ) is STRICKEN for failure to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1(a)(2). I FURTHER ORDER the plaintiffs to file a proper certificate of interested parties by June 23, 2023. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 6/12/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DLS)
|
| Filing 9 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Andrew P. Gordon. Judge Gordon's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MAJ) |
| Filing 7 ERROR: Document #1 was not filed pursuant to LR IC 2-2(c). The wrong event was selected. The title of the docket entry does not match the title of the document. CLERK'S NOTICE. Clerk refiled using complaint event. No further Attorney Action Required as to ECF No. #1 . Modified on 6/7/2023 (HAM). |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Jim Stewartson. (AMMi) |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Andrew P. Gordon and Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe. (AMMi) |
| Filing 5 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued by Plaintiff Kashyap Patel. (Chattah, Sigal) |
| Filing 8 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $402) by Kashyap Patel, The Kash Foundation, Inc. Certificate of Interested Parties due by 6/15/2023. Proof of service due by 9/3/2023. (HAM) |
| Filing 4 STRICKEN PER ECF No. #10 order. CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Kashyap Patel. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case. (Chattah, Sigal) Modified on 6/13/2023 (DLS). |
| Filing 3 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued by Plaintiff Kashyap Patel. (Chattah, Sigal) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET to #1 Amended Complaint by Plaintiff Kashyap Patel. (Chattah, Sigal) |
| Filing 1 ERROR: Amended complaint event selected by Plaintiff and refiled by clerk as complaint, see #8 complaint. AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants by Kashyap Patel. No changes to parties. (Chattah, Sigal) Modified on 6/7/2023 (HAM). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
