Siv v. Kijakazi
| Sodavy Siv |
| Kilolo Kijakazi |
| SSA-Office of the General Counsel |
| 2:2023cv00940 |
| June 16, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Cam Ferenbach |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney L. Jamala Edwards on behalf of Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi. (Edwards, L.) |
| Case randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach. (AF) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE to Clerk of Court Regarding Assignment of Social Security Cases. (Document restricted under General Order 2019-08.) (AF) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Sodavy Siv. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Kalagian, Marc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kilolo Kijakazi (Filing fee $402 receipt number ANVDC-7332940) by Sodavy Siv. Certificate of Interested Parties due by 6/26/2023. Proof of service due by 9/14/2023. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Kalagian, Marc) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. Modified on 6/21/2023 (AF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
