Jackson v. Key Insurance Company
| Cavisha Om Unique Jackson |
| Key Insurance Company |
| 2:2023cv01036 |
| July 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Daniel J Albregts |
| Jennifer A Dorsey |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Cavisha Om Unique Jackson. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Kane, Michael) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint filed by Key Insurance Company. Certificate of Interested Parties due by 8/10/2023. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 9/14/2023.(Goodhart, Philip) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Filing 5 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 7/7/2023. By Deputy Clerk: A.Miller. Statement regarding removed action is due by 7/22/2023. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 8/6/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AMMi) |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey and Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts. (AMMi) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE Defendant Key Insurance Company's Disclosure Statement Pursuant to FRCP 7.1 & LR 7.1-1 by Key Insurance Company.. (Goodhart, Philip) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Key Insurance Company. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Goodhart, Philip) |
| Filing 2 STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendant Key Insurance Company.. (Goodhart, Philip) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Eighth Judicial District, Clark County Nevada, Case Number A-23-872104-C, (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANVDC-7352903) by Key Insurance Company. Certificate of Interested Parties due by 7/16/2023. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Goodhart, Philip) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jackson v. Key Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Cavisha Om Unique Jackson | |
| Represented By: | Bradley J. Myers |
| Represented By: | Michael C. Kane |
| Represented By: | Nicholas Dion |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Key Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Philip Goodhart |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
