De Leon v. S.S.D.I. Appeals Council
Joyce De Leon |
S.S.D.I. Appeals Council |
SSA-Office of the General Counsel |
2:2023cv01344 |
August 29, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Daniel J Albregts |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 402 Social Security Benefits |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE to Clerk of Court Regarding Assignment of Social Security Cases. (Document restricted under General Order 2019-08.) (RGDG) |
Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE of Assignment of Social Security case to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to General Order 2019-08. Attached is a form to indicate whether you consent or decline to proceed before a Magistrate Judge. See notice for details. Consent or declination due by 9/9/2023. (AF) |
Filing 3 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. NOTICE of assignment of case to a United States Magistrate Judge and consent form. (RGDG) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/29/2023: #1 Consent Form) (RGDG). |
Filing 2 Consent for Electronic Service of Documents by Plaintiff Joyce De Leon. (RGDG) |
Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Joyce De Leon. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Summons, #3 Waiver, #4 Medical Records, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(RGDG) |
Case randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts. (RGDG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.