Adams v. BMW
| Robert Adams and BMW of North America, LLC |
| 2:2023cv01402 |
| September 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Daniel J Albregts |
| Anne R Traum |
| Motor Vehicle Prod. Liability |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by BMW of North America, LLC that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. Corporate Parent BMW (US) Holding Corp., Corporate Parent BMW AG for BMW of North America, LLC added.. (Reilly, Patrick) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint,, filed by BMW of North America, LLC. Certificate of Interested Parties due by 11/2/2023. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 12/7/2023.(Reilly, Patrick) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Filing 6
ORDER granting #5 Stipulation to Extend Deadline to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. BMW of North America, LLC Answer due 10/24/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 10/12/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CT)
|
| Filing 5 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (First Request) by Defendant BMW of North America, LLC. (Reilly, Patrick) (extend) (answer) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Robert Adams. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Katz, Robert) |
| Filing 3 CLERK'S NOTICE. To date, a Certificate of Interested Parties has not been filed, pursuant to LR 7.1-1, by Robert Adams. Certificate of Interested Parties due by 9/26/2023. (no image attached) (HAM) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to BMW of North America, LLC. (ALZ) |
| Case randomly assigned to District Judge Anne R. Traum and Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts. (ALZ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Robert Adams (Filing fee $402 receipt number ANVDC-7420410) by Robert Adams. Certificate of Interested Parties due by 9/18/2023. Proof of service due by 12/7/2023. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Affidavit) (Katz, Robert) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Adams v. BMW | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Robert Adams | |
| Represented By: | Robert B Katz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: BMW of North America, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Patrick J Reilly |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
