Chapman-Pinto v. Amazon.Com Services LLC
Katie Chapman-Pinto |
Amazon.com Services, LLC |
2:2023cv01458 |
September 18, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Andrew P Gordon |
Nancy J Koppe |
Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Amazon.com Services, LLC that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. Corporate Parent Amazon.com Sales, Inc., Other Affiliate Amazon.com, Inc. for Amazon.com Services, LLC added.. (Kim, Emil) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss #1 Complaint,, by Defendant Amazon.com Services, LLC. Responses due by 11/20/2023. Certificate of Interested Parties due by 11/16/2023. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 12/21/2023. (Krincek, Wendy) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
![]() |
Filing 5 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (First Request) re #1 Complaint,, by Defendant Amazon.com Services, LLC. (Kim, Emil) (extend) (answer) |
Filing 4 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Andrew P. Gordon. Judge Gordon's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MAJ) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Katie Chapman-Pinto. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case. (Balaban, Michael) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Amazon.com Services, LLC re #1 Complaint. (AMMi) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC (Filing fee $402 receipt number BNVDC-7430614) by Katie Chapman-Pinto. Certificate of Interested Parties due by 9/29/2023. Proof of service due by 12/18/2023. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (Balaban, Michael) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Case randomly assigned to Judge Andrew P. Gordon and Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe. (AMMi) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Chapman-Pinto v. Amazon.Com Services LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Katie Chapman-Pinto | |
Represented By: | Michael P. Balaban |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Amazon.com Services, LLC | |
Represented By: | Emil S Kim |
Represented By: | Wendy Krincek |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.