Sotelo v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
| Jose Sotelo |
| State Farm Fire and Casualty Company |
| 2:2023cv01541 |
| September 28, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Daniel J Albregts |
| Miranda M Du |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 NOTICE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE IB 2-2: In accordance with 28 USC 636(c) and FRCP 73, the parties in this action are provided with a link to the "AO 85 Notice of Availability, Consent, and Order of Reference - Exercise of Jurisdiction by a U.S. Magistrate Judge" form on the Court's website - #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. AO 85 Consent forms should NOT be electronically filed. Upon consent of all parties, counsel are advised to manually file the form with the Clerk's Office. (A copy of form AO 85 has been mailed to parties not receiving electronic service.) (no image attached) (CT) |
Filing 11
SCHEDULING ORDER granting #10 Revised Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. Discovery due by 3/26/2024. Motions due by 4/25/2024. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 5/28/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 11/21/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CT)
|
| Filing 10 Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order by Defendant State Farm Fire and Casualty Company.. (Harper, James) |
| Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 11/14/2023. Re: #8 Discovery Plan. Having reviewed the parties' stipulated discovery plan, which purports to be submitted in compliance with LR 26-1(b), the Court notes that the parties actually seek special scheduling review. The parties request that the Court set a 180-day schedule measured from the parties' 26(f) conference. However, LR 26-1(b)(1) provides that discovery should be measured from the date the first defendant answers or appears. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the parties' discovery plan #8 is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall meet and confer and file a revised stipulated discovery plan and scheduling order in compliance with Local Rule 26-1 by November 22, 2023. (no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KL) |
| Filing 8 Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order by Defendant State Farm Fire and Casualty Company.. (Harper, James) |
| Filing 7 Joint STATUS REPORT by Defendant State Farm Fire and Casualty Company.. (Harper, James) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER re #1 Petition for Removal,, filed by State Farm Fire and Casualty Company. Certificate of Interested Parties due by 10/20/2023. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 11/24/2023.(Harper, James) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Filing 5 STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendant State Farm Fire and Casualty Company.. (Harper, James) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by State Farm Fire and Casualty Company. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Harper, James) |
| Filing 3 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Miranda M. Du. Chief Judge Du's Civil Standing Order is posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website and may be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PAV) |
| Filing 2 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 9/28/2023. Statement regarding removed action is due by 10/13/2023. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 10/28/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from District Court, Case Number A-23-876405-C, (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANVDC-7442358) by State Farm Fire and Casualty Company. Certificate of Interested Parties due by 10/8/2023. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Harper, James) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts. (JQC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sotelo v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jose Sotelo | |
| Represented By: | Peter Maitland Angulo |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: State Farm Fire and Casualty Company | |
| Represented By: | James Ernest Harper |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
