Eddins v. Plant et al
William Eddins |
Sarah Marie Plant, John Carlos Marquez and Amelia Hannah Katherine Marquez |
2:2023cv01618 |
October 6, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Daniel J Albregts |
James C Mahan |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Amelia Hannah Katherine Marquez, John Carlos Marquez, Sarah Marie Plant re #1 Complaint. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons) (CAH) |
Case randomly assigned to Judge James C. Mahan and Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts. (CAH) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by William Eddins. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Salmon, David) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $402 receipt number ANVDC-7452049) by William Eddins. Certificate of Interested Parties due by 10/16/2023. Proof of service due by 1/4/2024. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons) (Salmon, David) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.