Smith v. Murray
| Linda Smith |
| Daniel Murray |
| 2:2023cv01726 |
| October 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Andrew P Gordon |
| Elayna J Youchah |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER granting ECF No. #7 Motion to Dismiss. The complaint (ECF No. #1 ) is dismissed without prejudice. The clerk of court is instructed to close this case. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 12/22/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DLS)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION to Stay Discovery by Defendant Daniel Murray. Responses due by 1/3/2024. (Attachments: #1 Declaration McIntosh Declaration, #2 Exhibit Emails)(McIntosh, Kenton) |
| Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 12/14/2023. Regarding the Requirements of Klingele v. Eikenberry and Rand v. Rowland as to #7 Motion to Dismiss,. Opposition due 14 days from the date of this Minute Order, and reply due seven 7 days after the filing of the opposition. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CT) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss by Defendant Daniel Murray. Responses due by 12/25/2023. Certificate of Interested Parties due by 12/21/2023. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 1/25/2024. (McIntosh, Kenton) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Filing 6 SECOND CLERK'S NOTICE. To date, a Certificate of Interested Parties has not been filed, pursuant to LR 7.1-1, by Linda Smith. Certificate of Interested Parties due by 11/21/2023. (no image attached) (CJS) |
| Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE. To date, a Certificate of Interested Parties has not been filed, pursuant to LR 7.1-1, by Linda Smith. Certificate of Interested Parties due by 11/13/2023. (no image attached) (CJS) |
| Filing 4 Consent for Electronic Service of Documents by Plaintiff Linda Smith. (DLS) |
| Filing 3 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (AMMi) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Daniel Murray re #1 Complaint. (AMMi) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Daniel Murray (Filing fee $402 - paid) by Linda Smith. Certificate of Interested Parties due by 11/3/2023. Proof of service due by 1/22/2024. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Receipt) (AMMi) |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Andrew P. Gordon and Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah. (CT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Smith v. Murray | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Linda Smith | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Daniel Murray | |
| Represented By: | Kenton Harold Dale McIntosh |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
