Jackson v. Clark County Detention Center
| Taijah Jackson |
| Clark County Detention Center |
| 2:2023cv01797 |
| November 1, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Cam Ferenbach |
| Andrew P Gordon |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Change of Address by Petitioner Taijah Jackson. (RGDG) |
| Filing 7 JUDGMENT in favor of Clark County Detention Center against Taijah Jackson. Dismissing the case without prejudice. The certificate of appealability is denied. Signed by Clerk of Court Debra K. Kempi on 11/30/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AMMi) |
| Filing 6 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Taijah Jackson. (AMMi - filed and dismissed per #5 Order.) |
Filing 5
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that Jackson's application to proceed in forma pauperis ([ECF No. #1 ) is GRANTED. Jackson's second application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. #3 ) is DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is to file the petition for writ of habeas corpus [ECF No. 1-1]. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition is DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is to: DIRECT INFORMAL ELECTRONIC SERVICE upon the respondents by adding Nevada Attorney General Aaron D. Ford as counsel for the respondents and sending a notice of electronic filing to his office for the petition (ECF No. 1-1) and this order. No response is required from the respondents other than to respond to any orders of a reviewing court. The Clerk of Court is ordered to enter final judgment dismissing this action and close this case. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 11/28/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AMMi)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Taijah Jackson. (ALZ) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE from USDC advising case against Taijah Jackson, et al., has been received and assigned case number 2:23-cv-01797-APG-VCF. (ALZ) |
| Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Taijah Jackson. (Attachments: #1 Petition, #2 Motion, #3 Affidavit, #4 Attachment)(ALZ) |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Andrew P. Gordon and Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach. (AMMi) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jackson v. Clark County Detention Center | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Taijah Jackson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Clark County Detention Center | |
| Represented By: | Aaron D. Ford-AG |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
