Cox v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
| Kiela Cox |
| State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company |
| 2:2023cv01990 |
| December 1, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Daniel J Albregts |
| Jennifer A Dorsey |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Joint STATUS REPORT by Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company.. (Harper, James) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Kiela Cox. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Shpirt, Paul) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER re #1 Petition for Removal,, filed by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. Certificate of Interested Parties due by 12/16/2023. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 1/20/2024.(Harper, James) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Filing 4 STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company.. (Harper, James) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Harper, James) |
| Filing 2 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 12/1/2023. Statement regarding removed action is due by 12/16/2023. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 12/31/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CAH) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from District Court, Case Number A-23-880122-C, (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ANVDC-7510911) by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. Certificate of Interested Parties due by 12/11/2023. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Harper, James) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey and Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts. (CAH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cox v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kiela Cox | |
| Represented By: | Paul A Shpirt |
| Represented By: | Steve Dimopoulos |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | James Ernest Harper |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
