Brooks v. Topaz Super Carwash et al
| Zalton E Brooks |
| Topaz Super Carwash and Bruno Bernada, Owners |
| 2:2023cv02060 |
| December 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Daniel J Albregts |
| Andrew P Gordon |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER Denying without prejudice #1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is kindly directed to send Plaintiff a blank application to proceed in forma pauperis by an inmate as well as the accompanying instruction packet. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that by March 8, 2024, Plaintiff must either: (1) file a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis, on the correct form with complete financial attachments; or (2) pay the full $405 filing fee for a civil action, which includes the $350 filing fee and the $55 administrative fee. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 2/7/2024. (Attachments: #1 IFP Inmate Application)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ALZ)
|
|
Filing 2
ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (CT)
|
|
Filing 1
MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Zalton E Brooks. (Attachments: #1 Complaint)(CT)
|
|
Case randomly assigned to Judge Andrew P. Gordon and Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts. (CT)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
