Dace v. TD Bank USA, N.A.
| Philip Dace |
| TD Bank USA, N.A. |
| 2:2023cv02122 |
| December 26, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Anne R Traum |
| Brenda Weksler |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Joint STATUS REPORT by Defendant TD Bank USA, N.A... (Young, Loren) |
| Filing 8 STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendant TD Bank USA, N.A... (Young, Loren) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable District Judge Anne R. Traum on 1/3/2024. Regarding the Requirements of Klingele v. Eikenberry and Rand v. Rowland as to ECF No. #6 Motion to Dismiss. Opposition due 14 days from the date of this Minute Order, and reply due seven 7 days after the filing of the opposition. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss by Defendant TD Bank USA, N.A.. Responses due by 1/16/2024. (Young, Loren) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE for #4 Minute Order Removal Case, by Defendant TD Bank USA, N.A... (Young, Loren) |
| Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable District Judge Anne R. Traum on 12/27/2023. By Deputy Clerk: A. Miller. Statement regarding removed action is due by 1/11/2024. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 1/26/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AMMi) |
| Case randomly assigned to District Judge Anne R. Traum and Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler. (AMMi) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by TD Bank USA, N.A. that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. Corporate Parent TD Bank US Holdings, LLC, Corporate Parent The Toronto-Dominion Bank, Corporate Parent TD Group US Holdings, LLC for TD Bank USA, N.A. added. (Young, Loren) |
| Filing 2 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Defendant TD Bank USA, N.A.. (Young, Loren) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Eighth Judicial District Court, Case Number A-23-881913-C, (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ANVDC-7534820) by TD Bank USA, N.A.. Certificate of Interested Parties due by 1/5/2024. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Young, Loren) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Dace v. TD Bank USA, N.A. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Philip Dace | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: TD Bank USA, N.A. | |
| Represented By: | Loren S Young |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
