Diggs v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
| Dishond M. Diggs |
| Nevada Department of Corrections, Charles Daniels, Calvin Johnson, Chief Medical Officer, Health Care Provider, Sergeant Moore and Infectious Nurse |
| 2:2023cv02156 |
| December 28, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Daniel J Albregts |
| Richard F Boulware |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER - IFP Application (ECF No. #1 ) is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff has until March 11, 2024, to either pay the full $405 filing fee or file a new fully complete IFP application. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send Plaintiff Dishond Diggs the approved form application to proceed in forma pauperis for an inmate and instructions for the same and retain the complaint (ECF No. #1 -1) but not file it at this time. (Mailed 1/12/2024). Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 1/11/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DLS)
|
| Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (CT) |
| Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Dishond M. Diggs. (Attachments: #1 Complaint)(CT) |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Richard F. Boulware, II and Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts. (AMMi) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
