Rodrigues v. National Consumer Telecom & Utilities Exchange, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Brent Rodrigues
Defendant: National Consumer Telecom & Utilities Exchange, Inc. and Cox Communication California, LLC
Case Number: 2:2024cv00046
Filed: January 5, 2024
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Presiding Judge: Maximiliano D Couvillier
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 22, 2024 Filing 7 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Plaintiff Brent Rodrigues. with National Consumer Telecom & Utilities Exchange, Inc.. (Haines, George)
January 22, 2024 Filing 6 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Plaintiff Brent Rodrigues. with Cox Communication California, LLC. (Haines, George)
January 8, 2024 Filing 5 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Cox Communication California, LLC, National Consumer Telecom & Utilities Exchange, Inc. re #1 Complaint. (CT)
January 8, 2024 Filing 4 OPTION TO DECLINE MAGISTRATE JUDGE OVERSEEING YOUR CASE. The attached form must be filed in the docket or received by the Clerk within 21 days of your first appearance in the case should you choose to decline consent. (A copy of the form has been mailed to parties not receiving electronic service.) (CT)
January 8, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 3 GENERAL ORDER 2023-11 IN RE: CONSENT AND REFERRALS TO UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGES UNDER 28 U.S.C. 636. (A copy of the General Order has been mailed to parties not receiving electronic service.) (CT)
January 8, 2024 Case randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Maximiliano D. Couvillier, III. (CT)
January 5, 2024 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Brent Rodrigues. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Haines, George)
January 5, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $405 receipt number ANVDC-7544437) by Brent Rodrigues. Certificate of Interested Parties due by 1/15/2024. Proof of service due by 4/4/2024. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Cox Communication, #3 Summons NCTUE) (Haines, George) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rodrigues v. National Consumer Telecom & Utilities Exchange, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brent Rodrigues
Represented By: George Haines
Represented By: Gerardo Avalos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: National Consumer Telecom & Utilities Exchange, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cox Communication California, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?