Alexander v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al
Plaintiff: Latia Alexander
Defendant: Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Kerry Kubla, Brice Clements, Alex Gonzales, Russell Backman, James Rothenberg and James Bertuccini
Case Number: 2:2024cv00074
Filed: January 9, 2024
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Presiding Judge: Andrew P Gordon
Referring Judge: Nancy J Koppe
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 22, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 16 REPLY to Response to #14 Motion to Dismiss by Plaintiff Latia Alexander, Counter Defendant Latia Alexander. (Breeden, Adam)
February 20, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 15 RESPONSE to #14 Motion to Dismiss by Defendants Russell Backman, James Bertuccini, Brice Clements, Alex Gonzales, Kerry Kubla, Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, James Rothenberg. Replies due by 2/27/2024. (Anderson, Craig)
February 12, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MOTION to Dismiss #12 Answer to Complaint,,,, Counterclaim,,, by Plaintiff Latia Alexander, Counter Defendant Latia Alexander. Responses due by 2/26/2024. (Breeden, Adam)
February 5, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 13 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Russell Backman, James Bertuccini, Brice Clements, Alex Gonzales, Kerry Kubla, Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, James Rothenberg. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case. (Anderson, Craig)
February 5, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ANSWER to #1 Complaint,, ( Certificate of Interested Parties due by 2/15/2024., Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 3/21/2024.), COUNTERCLAIM against Latia Alexander by Russell Backman, Kerry Kubla, James Rothenberg, Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, James Bertuccini, Brice Clements, Alex Gonzales. filed by Russell Backman, Kerry Kubla, James Rothenberg, Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, James Bertuccini, Brice Clements, Alex Gonzales.(Anderson, Craig) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court.
February 4, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Latia Alexander. James Bertuccini served on 1/16/2024. (Breeden, Adam)
January 26, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Latia Alexander. James Rothenberg served on 1/16/2024. (Breeden, Adam)
January 26, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Latia Alexander. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department served on 1/16/2024. (Breeden, Adam)
January 26, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Latia Alexander. Kerry Kubla served on 1/16/2024. (Breeden, Adam)
January 26, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Latia Alexander. Alex Gonzales served on 1/16/2024. (Breeden, Adam)
January 26, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Latia Alexander. Brice Clements served on 1/16/2024. (Breeden, Adam)
January 26, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Latia Alexander. Russell Backman served on 1/16/2024. (Breeden, Adam)
January 16, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Andrew P. Gordon. Judge Gordon's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MAJ)
January 9, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Russell Backman, James Bertuccini, Brice Clements, Alex Gonzales, Kerry Kubla, Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, James Rothenberg re #1 Complaint. (RJDG)
January 9, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Latia Alexander. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Breeden, Adam)
January 9, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $405 receipt number ANVDC-7548222) by Latia Alexander. Certificate of Interested Parties due by 1/19/2024. Proof of service due by 4/8/2024. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons LVMPD, #3 Summons Kubla, #4 Summons Backman, #5 Summons Bertuccini, #6 Summons Clements, #7 Summons Gonzales, #8 Summons Rothenberg) (Breeden, Adam) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court.
January 9, 2024 Opinion or Order Case randomly assigned to Judge Andrew P. Gordon and Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe. (RJDG)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Alexander v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Latia Alexander
Represented By: Adam J. Breeden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department
Represented By: Craig R. Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kerry Kubla
Represented By: Craig R. Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brice Clements
Represented By: Craig R. Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alex Gonzales
Represented By: Craig R. Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Russell Backman
Represented By: Craig R. Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James Rothenberg
Represented By: Craig R. Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James Bertuccini
Represented By: Craig R. Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?