Barron et al v. United States of America et al
| Bridget Barron and Tiffany Davis |
| United States of America, United States Postal Service, Louis DeJoy and Heather Scanlon |
| 2:2024cv00142 |
| January 22, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Daniel J Albregts |
| Cristina D Silva |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Auto Negligence |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #9 Stipulation to Extend Answer Deadline. Louis DeJoy answer due 4/8/2024. United States Postal Service answer due 4/8/2024. United States of America answer due 4/8/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 3/20/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CT)
|
| Filing 9 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (First Request) by Defendants Louis DeJoy, United States Postal Service, United States of America. (Colonna, Richard) (extend) (answer) |
| Filing 8 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Judge Cristina D. Silva. Judge Silva's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DXS) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Bridget Barron re #1 Complaint,,. United States Postal Service served on 2/5/2024. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Service on US Attorney Las Vegas, #2 Exhibit Service on US Attorney,DOJ, #3 Exhibit Service on United States Postal Service, #4 Exhibit Service on Postmaster General USPS)(Kennedy, Kirk) |
| Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE. Attorney Action Required to ECF No. #5 . Document was not filed pursuant to LR IC 2-2(c). The wrong event was selected. The title of the docket entry does not match the title of the document. Counsel is advised to refile ECF No. #5 using the appropriate docket entry title: summons returned executed/unexecuted. (no image attached) (HAM) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE Proof of Service of Summons and Complaint on Defendants Pursuant to FRCP 4i by Bridget Barron.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Service on US Attorney Las Vegas, #2 Exhibit Service on US Attorney, DOJ, #3 Exhibit Service on United States Postal Service, #4 Exhibit Service on Postmaster General)(Kennedy, Kirk) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Louis DeJoy, Heather Scanlon, United States Postal Service, United States of America re #1 Complaint. (ALZ) |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Cristina D. Silva and Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts. (ALZ) |
| Filing 3 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued by Plaintiff Bridget Barron. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(Kennedy, Kirk) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Bridget Barron. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Kennedy, Kirk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $405 receipt number ANVDC-7560754) by Bridget Barron. Certificate of Interested Parties due by 2/1/2024. Proof of service due by 4/21/2024. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Kennedy, Kirk) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
