Rai v. Costco Wholesale Corporation
Ashly Rai |
Costco Wholesale Corporation |
2:2024cv00161 |
January 23, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Jennifer A Dorsey |
Elayna J Youchah |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER Denying without Prejudice #13 Stipulated Protective Order. The parties are advised to file a revised proposed stipulated protective order correcting the deficiencies identified in this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah on 3/7/2024.(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KMB) |
Filing 13 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Confidentiality by Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation.. (Ranalli, George) |
Filing 12 NOTICE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE IB 2-2: In accordance with 28 USC 636(c) and FRCP 73, the parties in this action are provided with a link to the "AO 85 Notice of Availability, Consent, and Order of Reference - Exercise of Jurisdiction by a U.S. Magistrate Judge" form on the Court's website - #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. AO 85 Consent forms should NOT be electronically filed. Upon consent of all parties, counsel are advised to manually file the form with the Clerk's Office. (A copy of form AO 85 has been mailed to parties not receiving electronic service.) (no image attached) (JQC) |
Filing 11 SCHEDULING ORDER Granting #10 Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. Discovery due by 8/20/2024. Motions due by 9/19/2024. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 10/19/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah on 2/23/2024.(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC) |
Filing 10 Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order by Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation.. (Ranalli, George) |
Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah on 2/23/2024. By Judicial Assistant: E. Santiago. Pending before the Court is Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. ECF No. #7 . The parties seek an initial discovery period of 375 days. Although the Court understands this is a personal injury case and treatment is ongoing, such a lengthy initial discovery period will undoubtedly lead to the failure to actively pursue and conduct discovery until some unknown date in the future. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (ECF No. #7 ) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties must submit a revised Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order that includes an initial discovery period of no more than 210 days. So long as discovery is actively pursued in the initial period, the Court will grant reasonable extensions as necessary to allow the completion of necessary discovery. (no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ES) |
Filing 8 Joint STATUS REPORT Regarding Removed Case by Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation.. (Ranalli, George) |
Filing 7 Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order by Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation.. (Ranalli, George) |
Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Costco Wholesale Corporation. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case. (Ranalli, George) |
Filing 5 DECLARATION re #3 Minute Order Removal Case, by Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation.. (Ranalli, George) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Ashly Rai. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Carlson, Nathaniel) |
Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 1/25/2024. Statement regarding removed action is due by 2/9/2024. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 2/24/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC) |
Case randomly assigned to Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey and Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah. (JQC) |
Filing 2 STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation.. (Ranalli, George) |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Clark County District Court, Case Number A-23-872663- C, (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ANVDC-7563171) by Costco Wholesale Corporation. Certificate of Interested Parties due by 2/2/2024. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Ranalli, George) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Rai v. Costco Wholesale Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Ashly Rai | |
Represented By: | Paul S. Padda |
Represented By: | Srilata R. Shah |
Represented By: | Nathaniel Carlson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Costco Wholesale Corporation | |
Represented By: | George M. Ranalli |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.