Ritter v. Social Security
| Sharon Nichole Ritter |
| Commissioner Of Social Security |
| SSA-Office of the General Counsel |
| 2:2024cv00178 |
| January 25, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Daniel J Albregts |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 EXHIBIT A and B to #12 Amended Complaint by Plaintiff Sharon Nichole Ritter.. (Sbrolla, Lindsey) |
| Filing 12 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Commissioner Of Social Security by Sharon Nichole Ritter. No changes to parties. (Sbrolla, Lindsey) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Franco Becia on behalf of Defendant Commissioner Of Social Security. (Becia, Franco) |
| Filing 10 COMPLAINT against Commissioner Of Social Security by Sharon Nichole Ritter. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (JQC) |
Filing 9
ORDER Granting #1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's #1 -1 Complaint is dismissed without prejudice and with leave to amend. Amended Complaint deadline: 3/7/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 2/7/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Corrected Image/Document re #1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Sharon Nichole Ritter. (Service of corrected image is attached.). (Taylor, Hal) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE: Attorney Action Required to #1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Attorney Hal Taylor advised to review document #1 . The entry reflects a IFP Motion but a verified petition was filed. Please file the necessary paperwork that corrects your entry. (no image attached) (WJ) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER Granting #3 Verified Petition for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Lindsey M. Sbrolla for Sharon Nichole Ritter and approving Designation of Local Counsel Hal Taylor. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 1/30/2024. Any Attorney not yet registered with the Court's e-filng system shall register on the PACER website #www.pacer.gov(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ALZ)
|
| Filing 5 OPTION TO DECLINE MAGISTRATE JUDGE OVERSEEING YOUR CASE. The attached form must be filed in the docket or received by the Clerk within 21 days of your first appearance in the case should you choose to decline consent. (A copy of the form has been mailed to parties not receiving electronic service.) (CT) |
|
Filing 4
GENERAL ORDER 2023-12 IN RE: DIRECT ASSIGNMENT OF SOCIAL SECURITY CASES TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGES PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 636. (A copy of the General Order has been mailed to parties not receiving electronic service.) (CT)
|
| Case randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts. (CT) |
| Filing 3 MOTION/VERIFIED PETITION for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice by Lindsey M. Sbrooa and DESIGNATION of Local Counsel Hal Taylor (Filing fee $ 250 receipt number ANVDC-7566624) by Plaintiff Sharon Nichole Ritter. (Attachments: #1 Errata Cert.Good.Stand.PA)(Taylor, Hal) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Sharon Nichole Ritter. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case. (Taylor, Hal) |
| Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Sharon Nichole Ritter. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint, #2 Exhibit Ex. A Complaint, #3 Civil Cover Sheet CCS)(Taylor, Hal) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
