Schluter v. O'Malley
Plaintiff: Michael Schluter
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Interested Party: SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Case Number: 2:2024cv00204
Filed: January 30, 2024
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Presiding Judge: Nancy J Koppe
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 7, 2024 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Franco Becia on behalf of Defendant Martin O'Malley. (Becia, Franco)
February 1, 2024 Filing 6 COMPLAINT against Martin O'Malley by Michael Schluter. Certificate of Interested Parties due by 2/11/2024. Proof of service due by 5/1/2024. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (RJDG)
February 1, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER Granting #1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis with the caveat that the fees shall be paid if recovery is made. At this time, Plaintiff shall not be required to pre-pay the filing fee. The Clerk of Court shall file the Complaint. The Clerk shall provide notice of this action to the Commissioner pursuant to Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security. See Order for additional details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 2/1/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - RJDG)
January 30, 2024 Filing 4 OPTION TO DECLINE MAGISTRATE JUDGE OVERSEEING YOUR CASE. The attached form must be filed in the docket or received by the Clerk within 21 days of your first appearance in the case should you choose to decline consent. (A copy of the form has been mailed to parties not receiving electronic service.) (RJDG)
January 30, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 3 GENERAL ORDER 2023-12 IN RE: DIRECT ASSIGNMENT OF SOCIAL SECURITY CASES TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGES PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 636. (A copy of the General Order has been mailed to parties not receiving electronic service.) (RJDG)
January 30, 2024 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Michael Schluter. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Kalagian, Marc)
January 30, 2024 Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Michael Schluter. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kalagian, Marc)
January 30, 2024 Case randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe. (RJDG)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Schluter v. O'Malley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Schluter
Represented By: Leonard Stone
Represented By: Marc V Kalagian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Represented By: Franco Becia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Represented By: Blaine T Welsh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?