Lum et al v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
James Furtado Lum and Dorothy Lewis |
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. |
2:2024cv00300 |
February 12, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Richard F Boulware |
Elayna J Youchah |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER granting #13 AMENDED FRCP 26 JOINT DISCOVERY PLAN AND SCHEDULING ORDER. Discovery due by 8/12/2024. Motions due by 9/11/2024. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 10/11/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah on 4/11/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CAH) |
Filing 13 Amended Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order by Defendant Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.. (Rivera, Lynn) |
Filing 12 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re #10 Order on Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order, addressed to Stephen Keith Parke. Note: Unable to forward. (MAM) |
Filing 11 NOTICE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE IB 2-2: In accordance with 28 USC 636(c) and FRCP 73, the parties in this action are provided with a link to the "AO 85 Notice of Availability, Consent, and Order of Reference - Exercise of Jurisdiction by a U.S. Magistrate Judge" form on the Court's website - #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. AO 85 Consent forms should NOT be electronically filed. Upon consent of all parties, counsel are advised to manually file the form with the Clerk's Office. (A copy of form AO 85 has been mailed to parties not receiving electronic service.) (no image attached) (CAH) |
Filing 10 ORDER granting #9 Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. Discovery due by 8/12/2024. Motions due by 9/11/2024. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 10/11/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah on 3/29/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CAH) |
Filing 9 Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order by Defendant Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.. (Rivera, Lynn) |
Filing 8 STATUS REPORT by Defendant Home Depot U.S.A., Inc... (Rivera, Lynn) |
Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case.. (Rivera, Lynn) |
Filing 6 STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendant Home Depot U.S.A., Inc... (Rivera, Lynn) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Removal by Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. re #1 Petition for Removal,.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Rivera, Lynn) |
Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 2/13/2024. Statement regarding removed action is due by 2/28/2024. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 3/14/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CAH) |
Case randomly assigned to Judge Richard F. Boulware, II and Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah. (CAH) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF ACTION by Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. re #1 Petition for Removal,.. (Rivera, Lynn) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET to #1 Petition for Removal, by Defendant Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.. (Rivera, Lynn) |
Filing 1 First PETITION FOR REMOVAL from CLARK COUNTY DISTRICT COURT, Case Number A-23-867314-C, (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ANVDC-7585058) by Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.. Certificate of Interested Parties due by 2/22/2024. (Rivera, Lynn) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.