Abbott v. Williams et al
Petitioner: David Roy Abbott
Respondent: Brian Williams and Nevada Attorney General
Case Number: 2:2024cv00328
Filed: February 15, 2024
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Presiding Judge: Andrew P Gordon
Referring Judge: Brenda Weksler
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 23, 2024 Filing 7 USCA ORDER for Time Schedule as to #5 Notice of Appeal filed by David Roy Abbott. No briefing schedule will be set until this court and/or the district court determines whether a certificate of appealability (COA) should issue. USCA Case Number 24-999. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - RJDG)
February 23, 2024 Filing 6 USCA, Ninth Circuit Appellate Case Number 24-999 assigned to #5 Notice of Appeal. (no image attached) (RJDG)
February 22, 2024 Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to ECF No. #3 Order, by Petitioner David Roy Abbott. Filing fee NOT paid. E-mail notice (NEF) sent to the US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. (GA)
February 20, 2024 Filing 4 JUDGMENT in favor of Nevada Attorney General, Brian Williams against David Roy Abbott. The Petitioner is denied a certificate of appealability. Signed by Clerk of Court Debra K. Kempi on 2/20/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CT)
February 16, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER DISMISSING CASE. IT IS FURTHER ORDER that, as reasonable jurists would not find this order to be debatable, the petitioner is denied a certificate of appealability. IT IS FURTHER ORDER that the Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close this case. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 2/16/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CT)
February 15, 2024 Filing 2 NOTICE from USDC advising case against Brian Williams, et al., has been received and assigned case number 2:24-cv-00328-APG-BNW. (GA)
February 15, 2024 Filing 1 RECEIPT of Initiating Documents by Court on behalf of Petitioner. No Application to Proceed IFP or Filing Fee received. (Attachments: #1 Petition for Writ, #2 Exhibits1, #3 Exhibits2, #4 Exhibits3, #5 Exhibits4) (GA) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/15/2024: #6 Exhibit 5) (GA).
February 15, 2024 Case randomly assigned to Judge Andrew P. Gordon and Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler. (GA)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Abbott v. Williams et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: David Roy Abbott
Represented By: Law Library - High Desert State Prison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Brian Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Nevada Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?