Modern Eminence LLC et al v. Nathan Park
Plaintiff: Modern Eminence LLC and Modern Fortress, Inc.
Defendant: AllRealms Inc. and Nathan Park
Case Number: 2:2024cv00348
Filed: February 19, 2024
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Presiding Judge: Cristina D Silva
Referring Judge: Elayna J Youchah
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 16, 2024 Filing 12 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Nathan Park re #6 Amended Complaint. (RJDG)
April 15, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER granting #8 Verified Petition for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Payne Keinarth for AllRealms Inc.,Payne Keinarth for Modern Eminence LLC,Payne Keinarth for Modern Fortress, Inc. and approving Designation of Local Counsel as to John P. Desmond. Signed by Judge Cristina D. Silva on 4/15/2024. Any Attorney not yet registered with the Court's e-filng system shall register on the PACER website #www.pacer.gov(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CT)
April 15, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER granting #7 Verified Petition for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice for Attorney John R. Nelson for Modern Eminence LLC,John R. Nelson for Modern Fortress, Inc. and approving Designation of Local Counsel as to John P. Desmond. Signed by Judge Cristina D. Silva on 4/15/2024. Any Attorney not yet registered with the Court's e-filng system shall register on the PACER website #www.pacer.gov(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CT)
April 12, 2024 Filing 9 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued Defendant Nathan Park by Plaintiffs AllRealms Inc., Modern Eminence LLC, Modern Fortress, Inc.. (Desmond, John)
April 10, 2024 Filing 8 MOTION/VERIFIED PETITION for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice by Payne Keinarth and DESIGNATION of Local Counsel John P. Desmond (Filing fee $ 250 receipt number ANVDC-7648062) by Plaintiffs AllRealms Inc., Modern Eminence LLC, Modern Fortress, Inc.. (Desmond, John)
April 10, 2024 Filing 7 MOTION/VERIFIED PETITION for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice by John R. Nelson and DESIGNATION of Local Counsel John P. Desmond (Filing fee $ 250 receipt number ANVDC-7648048) by Plaintiffs AllRealms Inc., Modern Eminence LLC, Modern Fortress, Inc.. (Desmond, John)
March 27, 2024 Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Nathan Park by Modern Eminence LLC, AllRealms Inc.. Adds new parties. (Desmond, John)
March 27, 2024 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney John Patrick Desmond on behalf of Plaintiffs AllRealms Inc., Modern Eminence LLC. (Desmond, John)
February 27, 2024 Filing 4 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Judge Cristina D. Silva. Judge Silva's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DXS)
February 21, 2024 Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Nathan Park re #1 Complaint. (CT)
February 21, 2024 Case randomly assigned to Judge Cristina D. Silva and Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah. (CT)
February 20, 2024 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by AllRealms Inc., Modern Eminence LLC. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Raich, Sagar)
February 20, 2024 Filing 1 First COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $405 receipt number BNVDC-7592481) by Modern Eminence LLC, AllRealms Inc.. Certificate of Interested Parties due by 3/1/2024. Proof of service due by 5/20/2024. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Raich, Sagar) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Modern Eminence LLC et al v. Nathan Park
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Modern Eminence LLC
Represented By: Brian Westphal Schneider
Represented By: John R. Nelson
Represented By: Payne Keinarth
Represented By: John Patrick Desmond
Represented By: Sagar R. Raich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Modern Fortress, Inc.
Represented By: John R. Nelson
Represented By: Payne Keinarth
Represented By: John Patrick Desmond
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AllRealms Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nathan Park
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?