Uy et al v. Van et al
Jocelyne R Uy and Westley U. Villanueva |
Sandy Van, Van Le Ngan, Sandy Van, LLC, Van and Associates Law Firm PLLC, JML Holdings, LLC, Ngan Van Le and JML Surgical Center, LLC |
2:2024cv00599 |
March 27, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Labor: Fair Standards |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by JML Holdings, LLC, JML Surgical Center, LLC, Ngan Van Le, Van Le Ngan, Sandy Van, LLC, Sandy Van, Van and Associates Law Firm PLLC. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Thome, Sheri) |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from 8th Judicial District, Case Number A-23-883063-C, (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ANVDC-7632242) by JML Surgical Center, LLC, Sandy Van, Ngan Van Le, JML Holdings, LLC, Van Le Ngan, Sandy Van, LLC, Van and Associates Law Firm PLLC. Certificate of Interested Parties due by 4/6/2024. (Attachments: #1 Appendix, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (Thome, Sheri) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.