Erevia v. O'Malley
| Zakkary C. Erevia |
| Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley |
| SSA-Office of the General Counsel |
| 2:2024cv00637 |
| April 2, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Daniel J Albregts |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 OPTION TO DECLINE MAGISTRATE JUDGE OVERSEEING YOUR CASE. The attached form must be filed in the docket or received by the Clerk within 21 days of your first appearance in the case should you choose to decline consent. (A copy of the form has been mailed to parties not receiving electronic service.) (CJS) |
Filing 3
GENERAL ORDER 2023-12 IN RE: DIRECT ASSIGNMENT OF SOCIAL SECURITY CASES TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGES PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 636. (A copy of the General Order has been mailed to parties not receiving electronic service.) (CJS)
|
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Zakkary C. Erevia. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Kalagian, Marc) |
| Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Zakkary C. Erevia. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kalagian, Marc) |
| Case randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts. (CJS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
