Hutchison v. Ethical Capital Partners et al
Melissa Hutchison |
Ethical Capital Partners, Aylo Premium Ltd., DM Productions, Digital Playground, Mind Geek USA Incorporated, MG Premium Ltd., Danny Martin, Frank Petosa, Ryan Hogan and Michael Woodside |
2:2024cv00673 |
April 5, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 DECLARATION of Rory T. Kay re #1 Petition for Removal,, by Defendants Ryan Hogan, Frank Petosa, Michael Woodside. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Kay, Rory) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Rory T Kay on behalf of Defendants Ryan Hogan, Frank Petosa, Michael Woodside. (Kay, Rory) |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Eighth Judicial District Court, Case Number A-24-887250-C, (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ANVDC-7644208) by Ryan Hogan, Frank Petosa, Michael Woodside. Proof of service due by 5/15/2024. Certificate of Interested Parties due by 4/15/2024. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Civil Cover Sheet) (Kay, Rory) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.