De Niro v. Arise Virtual Solutions, Inc.
| Diavion De Niro |
| Arise Virtual Solutions, Inc. |
| 2:2024cv00695 |
| April 10, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Andrew P Gordon |
| Elayna J Youchah |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Certify Class Motion for Conditional Certification Responses due by 4/24/2024. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Declaration of Diavion De Niro, #3 Declaration of Joseph Haymon, #4 Exhibit A - Proposed Notice, #5 Exhibit B - Proposed Opt-In Form, #6 Exhibit C - Pendergraft Arbitration Award, #7 Exhibit D - Abdul-Haqq Arbitration Award, #8 Exhibit E - NLRB Decision, #9 Exhibit F - Grove v. Iowa Playhouse, #10 Exhibit G - Meet the Customer Services Reps - Arise Article, #11 Exhibit H - DOL Investigation)(McDonald, Sean) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Arise Virtual Solutions, Inc. re #1 Complaint. (MAM) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO COUNSEL PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE IA 11-2. Counsel Adelaide Pagano and Shannon Liss-Riordan to comply with completion and filing of the Verified Petition and Designation of Local Counsel. The form is available on the Court's website - #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. Counsel is required to register for the court's electronic filing system at PACER #www.pacer.gov to register Attorney. Verified Petition due by 4/24/2024. (no image attached) (MAM) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Diavion De Niro. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (McDonald, Sean) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Arise Virtual Solutions, Inc. (Filing fee $405 receipt number ANVDC-7648017) by Diavion De Niro. (CLASS ACTION) Certificate of Interested Parties due by 4/20/2024. Proof of service due by 7/9/2024. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Index Index of Exhibits, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #4 Summons Proposed Summons) (McDonald, Sean) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Andrew P. Gordon and Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah. (MAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: De Niro v. Arise Virtual Solutions, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Diavion De Niro | |
| Represented By: | Adelaide Pagano |
| Represented By: | Kristina L. Hillman |
| Represented By: | Sean W. McDonald |
| Represented By: | Shannon Liss-Riordan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Arise Virtual Solutions, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
