Brugman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al
Jacquelynn Brugman |
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and Rogers Mastrangelo Carvalho & Mitchell, Ltd. |
2:2024cv00888 |
May 13, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Cristina D Silva |
Brenda Weksler |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Cristina D. Silva on 5/13/2024. By Deputy Clerk: A. Miller. Statement regarding removed action is due by 5/28/2024. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 6/12/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AMMi) |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from District Court, Case Number A-24-890227-C, (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ANVDC-7683373) by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. Proof of service due by 6/30/2024. Certificate of Interested Parties due by 5/23/2024. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Selim, Taylor) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Case randomly assigned to Judge Cristina D. Silva and Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler. (AMMi) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.