Hill v. Social Security
Plaintiff: Laquanda Hill
Defendant: Social Security
Interested Party: SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Case Number: 2:2024cv01539
Filed: August 21, 2024
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Presiding Judge: Daniel J Albregts
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 206 Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 20, 2024 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Angela Thornton-Millard on behalf of Defendant Social Security. (Thornton-Millard, Angela)
September 4, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER Denying without prejudice #1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff has until October 4, 2024 to file an updated application to proceed in forma pauperis as specified in this order or pay the filing fee. Failure to timely comply with this order may result in a recommendation to the district judge that this case be dismissed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is kindly directed to send Plaintiff a copy of this order and of the Short Form application to proceed in forma pauperis and its instructions. IFP or payment of filing fees due 10/4/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 9/4/2024. (Attachments: #1 Information for Filing an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - RJDG)
August 22, 2024 Filing 5 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (MAM)
August 22, 2024 Filing 4 OPTION TO DECLINE MAGISTRATE JUDGE OVERSEEING YOUR CASE. The attached form must be filed in the docket or received by the Clerk within 21 days of your first appearance in the case should you choose to decline consent. (A copy of the form has been mailed to parties not receiving electronic service.) (MAM)
August 22, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 3 GENERAL ORDER 2023-12 IN RE: DIRECT ASSIGNMENT OF SOCIAL SECURITY CASES TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGES PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 636. (A copy of the General Order has been mailed to parties not receiving electronic service.) (MAM)
August 21, 2024 Filing 2 Consent for Electronic Service of Documents by Plaintiff Laquanda Hill. (MAM)
August 21, 2024 Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Laquanda Hill. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons)(MAM)
August 21, 2024 Case randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts. (CAH)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hill v. Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Laquanda Hill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security
Represented By: Angela Thornton-Millard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Represented By: Blaine T Welsh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?