Holley et al v. The United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs et al
Plaintiff: Te-Moak Tribe of Western Shoshone Indians of Nevada and Joseph Holley
Defendant: The United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs and Darryl LaCounte
Case Number: 2:2024cv01629
Filed: September 4, 2024
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Presiding Judge: Daniel J Albregts
Referring Judge: Jennifer A Dorsey
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 4, 2024 Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Darryl LaCounte, The United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs, U.S. Attorney re #1 Complaint. (RJDG)
September 4, 2024 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Joseph Holley, Te-Moak Tribe of Western Shoshone Indians of Nevada. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Rickard, Jarrod)
September 4, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Darryl LaCounte, The United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs (Filing fee $405 receipt number ANVDC-7799147) by Joseph Holley, Te-Moak Tribe of Western Shoshone Indians of Nevada. Certificate of Interested Parties due by 9/14/2024. Proof of service due by 12/3/2024. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons US Dept of Interior, BIA, #3 Summons Darryl LaCounte, #4 Summons US Attorney) (Rickard, Jarrod) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court.
September 4, 2024 Case randomly assigned to Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey and Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts. (RJDG)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Holley et al v. The United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Te-Moak Tribe of Western Shoshone Indians of Nevada
Represented By: Katie Lynn Cannata
Represented By: John W Muije
Represented By: Jarrod L. Rickard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joseph Holley
Represented By: Katie Lynn Cannata
Represented By: John W Muije
Represented By: Jarrod L. Rickard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Darryl LaCounte
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?