Smith v. City of North Las Vegas et al
| Greg Smith |
| City of North Las Vegas, Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Michael Glenn, Anthony Powell, William Kearnes, Robert Stephenson, Juan Espinoza, Oscar Martinez, Ronald Quintana, Angel Valladares, Nichelle Kelly, Garddy Lustin and Blair Ludwig |
| 2:2025cv00525 |
| March 20, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Daniel J Albregts |
| Andrew P Gordon |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 9, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 28
ORDER Granting #27 Stipulation to Extend Discovery. Discovery due by 3/3/2026. Motions due by 4/2/2026. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 5/4/2026. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 9/12/2025. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MAM)
|
|
Filing 27
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (First Request) re discovery deadlines re #13 Order on Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order,,,,,,, by Defendant Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department.. (Anderson, Lyssa) (extend) (discovery)
|
|
Filing 26
JOINDER to #25 Motion to Dismiss by Defendant City of North Las Vegas. (Holt, Danielle)
|
|
Filing 25
MOTION to Dismiss #20 Amended Complaint, by Defendant Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department. Responses due by 9/22/2025. (Anderson, Lyssa)
|
|
Filing 24
ORDER - Defendant Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department's motion to dismiss (ECF No. #15 ) is DENIED as moot because it is directed at an earlier version of the complaint. Signed by Chief Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 9/3/2025.(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DLS)
|
|
Filing 22
SUMMONS ISSUED as to Juan Espinoza, Michael Glenn, William Kearnes, Nichelle Kelly, Blair Ludwig, Garddy Lustin, Oscar Martinez, Anthony Powell, Ronald Quintana, Robert Stephenson, Angel Valladares re #1 Petition for Removal. (JG)
|
|
Filing 23
ORDER Granting #19 Stipulation to File Second Amended Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 8/29/2025. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - RJDG)
|
|
Filing 21
PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued to Defendants by Plaintiff Greg Smith. (Benson, Joshua)
|
|
Filing 20
Second AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against City of North Las Vegas, Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Michael Glenn, Anthony Powell, William Kearnes, Robert Stephenson, Juan Espinoza, Oscar Martinez, Ronald Quintana, Angel Valladares, Nichelle Kelly, Garddy Lustin, Blair Ludwig by Greg Smith. Adds new parties. (Benson, Joshua)
|
|
Filing 19
STIPULATION to File Second Amended Complaint by Plaintiff Greg Smith.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Second Amended Complaint)(Benson, Joshua) (other) (pleading)
|
|
Filing 18
REPLY to Response to #15 Motion to Dismiss by Defendant Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department. (Anderson, Lyssa)
|
|
Filing 17
RESPONSE to #15 Motion to Dismiss by Plaintiff Greg Smith. Replies due by 5/2/2025. (Benson, Joshua)
|
|
Filing 16
Joint STATUS REPORT by Defendant Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department. (Anderson, Lyssa)
|
|
Filing 15
MOTION to Dismiss #9 Amended Complaint by Defendant Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department. Responses due by 4/25/2025. (Anderson, Lyssa)
|
|
Filing 14
ANSWER to #9 Amended Complaint filed by City of North Las Vegas.(Holt, Danielle)
|
|
Filing 13
SCHEDULING ORDER Granting #12 Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. Discovery due by 12/3/2025. Motions due by 1/4/2026. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 2/3/2026. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 4/9/2025. NOTICE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE IB 2-2: In accordance with 28 USC 636(c) and FRCP 73, the parties in this action are provided with a link to the "AO 85 Notice of Availability, Consent, and Order of Reference - Exercise of Jurisdiction by a U.S. Magistrate Judge" form on the Court's website - #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. AO 85 Consent forms should NOT be electronically filed. Upon consent of all parties, counsel are advised to manually file the form with the Clerk's Office. (A copy of form has been sent to parties not receiving electronic service.)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - RJDG)
|
|
Filing 12
Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order by Plaintiff Greg Smith. (Benson, Joshua)
|
|
Filing 11
STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendant Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department. (Anderson, Lyssa)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER denying as moot #6 Motion to Dismiss. See order for details. Signed by Chief Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 3/31/2025.(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ALZ)
|
|
Filing 9
First AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Greg Smith by Greg Smith. Adds new parties. (Benson, Joshua)
|
|
Filing 8
CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by City of North Las Vegas. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Holt, Danielle)
|
|
Filing 7
ANSWER to Complaint filed by City of North Las Vegas. Certificate of Interested Parties due by 4/6/2025. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 4/26/2025.(Holt, Danielle) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court.
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION to Dismiss by Defendant Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department. Responses due by 4/10/2025. (Anderson, Lyssa)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER. In this removed case, Greg Smith, counseled, brings this civil-rights action under 42 U.S.C. 1983 for events that took place while he was incarcerated at the North Las Vegas Correctional Facility. ECF No. #1 -1. Smith is no longer incarcerated, and defendants have paid the $405 filing fee for this civil action. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this case will proceed onto the normal litigation track. Signed by Chief Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 3/26/2025. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CAH)
|
|
Filing 4
CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Anderson, Lyssa)
|
|
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Andrew P. Gordon. Judge Gordon's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MAJ)
|
|
Filing 2
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Chief Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 3/21/2025. By Deputy Clerk: A. Miller. Statement regarding removed action is due by 4/5/2025. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 4/20/2025. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AMMi)
|
|
Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Andrew P. Gordon and Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts. (AMMi)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Eight Judicial District Court of Nevada, Case Number A-25-912756-C, (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ANVDC-7993288) by Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department. Certificate of Interested Parties due by 3/30/2025. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (Kalkowski, Kristopher) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court.
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
