Protective Life Insurance Company v. Cephus
| Protective Life Insurance Company |
| Gabe Sablica and Redjara Cephus |
| 2:2026cv03608 |
| October 30, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 30, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 SUPPLEMENT to #2 Certificate of Interested Parties Corporate Disclosure and Diversity Jurisdiction Statment by Plaintiff Protective Life Insurance Company (Andrews, Ann-Martha) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Protective Life Insurance Company. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Andrews, Ann-Martha) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Redjara Cephus, Gabe Sablica (Filing fee $405 receipt number ANVDC-8791757) by Protective Life Insurance Company. Certificate of Interested Parties is due by 11/9/2026. Proof of service is due by 1/28/2027. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Andrews, Ann-Martha) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
