Herrera v. Mc Daniel et al
| Frankie Sue Del Papa |
| Julio Herrera |
| E K Mc Daniel |
| Robert E Wieland |
| 3:1993cv00733 |
| March 15, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| Howard D. McKibben |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
46
USCA ORDER 11-70280 - The application for authorization to file a second or successive 28:2254 habeas corpus petition in the district court is denied. Petitioner has not made a prima facie showing under 28:2244(b)(2) that: (A) the claim rel ies on a new rule of constitutional law, made retroactive to cases on collateral review by the Supreme Court, that was previously unavailable; or (B)(i) the factual predicate for the claim could not have been discovered previously through the exercis e of due diligence; and (ii) the facts underlying the claim, if proven and viewed in light of the evidence as a whole, would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that, but for constitutional error, no reasonable fact finder wou ld have found the petitioner guilty of the underlying offense. All pending motions are denied as moot. No petition for rehearing or motion for reconsideration shall be filed or entertained in this case. See 28:2244(b)(3)(E). (Copies have been distributed via NEF) Modified on 3/15/2011 to reflect that USDC case number was found in the 1 Second Successive Petition. (MLC).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
